chore: prepare for code review - BED-8268

[mykeelium]

Description

These changes are here for another pull request with prepare for code review.

Motivation and Context

Resolves BED-8268

Why is this change required? What problem does it solve?

How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe in detail how you tested your changes.
Include details of your testing environment, and the tests you ran to
see how your change affects other areas of the code, etc.

Screenshots (optional):

Types of changes

• Chore (a change that does not modify the application functionality)

Checklist:

• I have met the contributing prerequisites
  • Assigned myself to this PR
  • Added the appropriate labels
  • Associated an issue: Issues and Pull Requests README #672
  • Read the Contributing guide: https://github.com/SpecterOps/BloodHound/wiki/Contributing
• I have ensured that related documentation is up-to-date
  • Open API docs
  • Code comments (GoDocs / JSDocs)
• I have followed proper test practices
  • Added/updated tests to cover my changes
  • All new and existing tests passed

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated indirect project dependencies to newer patch/minor versions to improve stability and compatibility.
  • Changes are dependency-only; no exported/public API, runtime behavior, or user-facing features were altered.
  • Low-risk maintenance: no configuration or usage changes required from end users.

[coderabbitai]

Linter diff in the way? Review this PR in Change Stack to focus on meaningful changes and expand context only when needed.

Note

Reviews paused

It looks like this branch is under active development. To avoid overwhelming you with review comments due to an influx of new commits, CodeRabbit has automatically paused this review. You can configure this behavior by changing the reviews.auto_review.auto_pause_after_reviewed_commits setting.

Use the following commands to manage reviews:

• @coderabbitai resume to resume automatic reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger a single review.

Use the checkboxes below for quick actions:

• ▶️ Resume reviews
• 🔍 Trigger review

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository YAML (base), Organization UI (inherited)

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: ae64ce59-8bd3-4023-81f2-2725edc55d6e

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2364184 and aa5451a.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)

• go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• go.mod

🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)

• go.mod

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This PR updates indirect Go module dependencies in go.mod: adds github.com/clipperhouse/uax29/v2 v2.2.0, bumps github.com/mattn/go-runewidth to v0.0.19, and bumps github.com/stretchr/objx to v0.5.3.

Changes

Dependency updates

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Dependency version updates go.mod	Adds indirect requirement github.com/clipperhouse/uax29/v2 v2.2.0; updates indirect versions: github.com/mattn/go-runewidth -> v0.0.19, github.com/stretchr/objx -> v0.5.3.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Suggested labels

go

Suggested reviewers

• urangel
• ddlees
• benwaples

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly identifies this as a chore PR related to dependency updates and code review preparation for ticket BED-8268, matching the changeset's focus on Go module dependency updates.
Description check	✅ Passed	The description covers most required template sections including Motivation/Context, Types of Changes, and Checklist, though the Description section lacks detailed explanation of the specific changes made.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch mcuomo/BED-8268

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}