Skip to content

Add Codex Maven command runner#1794

Merged
kevinherron merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/add-codex-maven-command-runner
Jul 5, 2026
Merged

Add Codex Maven command runner#1794
kevinherron merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/add-codex-maven-command-runner

Conversation

@kevinherron

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Add Codex-facing Maven command runner instructions and remove the obsolete preflight review gate from project agent guidance.

  • Add a Codex Maven runner prompt so Maven commands can be delegated to a read-only worker that captures and summarizes build output.
  • Update repository instructions to make format and compile the required verification steps while leaving review gates to manual or workflow-specific processes.
  • Remove the Claude preflight agent definition so future agents do not discover or invoke the stale review requirement.

Key Changes

  • Verification policy: AGENTS.md no longer requires a preflight review before committing. It now keeps the Maven verification requirement and clarifies that reviews happen manually or through workflow-specific gates.
  • Codex Maven delegation: The new Codex runner prompt mirrors the existing Claude runner behavior: run requested Maven commands once, capture output under /tmp/maven_*.log, analyze failures, and avoid modifying repository files.
  • Agent cleanup: The unused preflight agent file is removed to keep the repository guidance aligned with the current workflow.

Testing

  • Not run; this PR only changes agent and repository instruction files.

Remove the preflight review gate from project instructions now that reviews are handled manually or by workflow-specific gates. Add a Codex Maven runner prompt so Maven verification has the same read-only delegated workflow as Claude.
@kevinherron kevinherron merged commit ae9b510 into main Jul 5, 2026
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant