Update tool npm:@napi-rs/cli to v3.7.0

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Change	Age	Confidence
npm:@napi-rs/cli (source)	3.6.2 → 3.7.0

---

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

---

Release Notes

napi-rs/napi-rs (npm:@​napi-rs/cli)

v3.7.0

Compare Source

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

• Branch creation
  • "before 4am every weekday,every weekend"
• Automerge
  • "before 4am every weekday,every weekend"

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hash	Ready	Preview, Comment	Jun 11, 2026 12:18am
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ready	Preview, Comment	Jun 11, 2026 12:18am
petrinaut	Ready	Preview, Comment	Jun 11, 2026 12:18am

[cursor]

PR Summary

Low Risk
Single dev-tool version pin in mise; no runtime, auth, or application logic changes.

Overview
Bumps the mise-pinned dev dependency npm:@napi-rs/cli from 3.6.2 to 3.7.0 in .config/mise/config.toml. No application or build script changes—only the toolchain version used when developers install/run the NAPI-RS CLI via mise.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit c96f522. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.}

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will improve performance by 18.18%

⚠️ Different runtime environments detected

Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.

Open the report in CodSpeed to investigate

⚡ 2 improved benchmarks
✅ 78 untouched benchmarks

Performance Changes

	Benchmark	BASE	HEAD	Efficiency
⚡	bit_matrix/dense/iter_row[64]	170 ns	140.8 ns	+20.71%
⚡	bit_matrix/dense/iter_row[200]	215 ns	185.8 ns	+15.7%

Tip

Curious why this is faster? Comment @codspeedbot explain why this is faster on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.

---

_{Comparing deps/tool/npm-napi-rs-cli-3.x (c96f522) with main (a7f5460)¹}

Footnotes

1. No successful run was found on main (e0c0304) during the generation of this report, so a7f5460 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$26.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 174 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.767 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.57 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.08 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$13.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 115 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.036 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$43.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 317 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.708 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$15.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 99.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.14 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$25.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 197 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.133 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$27.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 254 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.270 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.94 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.01 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$14.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 103 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.415 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.81 \mathrm{ms} \pm 31.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.218 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.06 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.290 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.41 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.935 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.19 \mathrm{ms} \pm 39.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.198 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.60 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.201 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$4.11 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.202 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.36 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.731 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.47 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.829 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$4.17 \mathrm{ms} \pm 40.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.75 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.64 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.199 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.55 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.016 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.63 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.27 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$2.87 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.064 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.71 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.06 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$2.88 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.084 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$3.04 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.463 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.75 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.084 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$3.01 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.557 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.43 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.133 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.98 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.015 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.32 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.657 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.34 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.464 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.04 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.25 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.42 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.80 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$54.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 346 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.610 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$47.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 205 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.914 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$51.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 310 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.366 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$51.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.14 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{lightgreen}-8.711 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$64.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 364 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.304 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$63.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 579 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.904 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$57.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 295 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.678 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$105 \mathrm{ms} \pm 548 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.02 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$48.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 303 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.82 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$325 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.23 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}17.5 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$20.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 144 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.50 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$21.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 146 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.95 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$21.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 140 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.684 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$20.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 130 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.49 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$26.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 158 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.114 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$20.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 120 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.38 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$20.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 141 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.601 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$20.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 110 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.17 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$21.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 124 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.68 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$27.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 215 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.037 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$36.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 321 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.66 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$35.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 317 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.821 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$35.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 286 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.93 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$34.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 307 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.395 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$35.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 254 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.898 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$37.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 305 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.512 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$37.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 294 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.148 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$36.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 269 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.741 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$36.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 275 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.427 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba	$$8.55 \mathrm{ms} \pm 41.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.493 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$92.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 496 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.170 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$151 \mathrm{ms} \pm 655 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.515 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$102 \mathrm{ms} \pm 539 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.143 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$114 \mathrm{ms} \pm 611 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.522 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$124 \mathrm{ms} \pm 591 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.19 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$131 \mathrm{ms} \pm 659 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.980 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$106 \mathrm{ms} \pm 624 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.516 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$133 \mathrm{ms} \pm 790 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.428 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$111 \mathrm{ms} \pm 455 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.812 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$123 \mathrm{ms} \pm 569 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.898 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$124 \mathrm{ms} \pm 616 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.585 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$124 \mathrm{ms} \pm 718 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.069 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$164 \mathrm{ms} \pm 2.38 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{lightgreen}-11.194 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$143 \mathrm{ms} \pm 468 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-17.475 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$41.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 188 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.80 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$563 \mathrm{ms} \pm 966 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.264 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph