Skip to content

Update @types/dateformat to the latest version 🚀#36

Open
greenkeeper[bot] wants to merge 3 commits intomasterfrom
greenkeeper/@types/dateformat-3.0.0
Open

Update @types/dateformat to the latest version 🚀#36
greenkeeper[bot] wants to merge 3 commits intomasterfrom
greenkeeper/@types/dateformat-3.0.0

Conversation

@greenkeeper
Copy link
Contributor

@greenkeeper greenkeeper bot commented Dec 25, 2018

The devDependency @types/dateformat was updated from 1.0.2 to 3.0.0.

This version is not covered by your current version range.

If you don’t accept this pull request, your project will work just like it did before. However, you might be missing out on a bunch of new features, fixes and/or performance improvements from the dependency update.


Find out more about this release.

FAQ and help

There is a collection of frequently asked questions. If those don’t help, you can always ask the humans behind Greenkeeper.


Your Greenkeeper bot 🌴

@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #36 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master      #36   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.36%   91.36%           
=======================================
  Files           1        1           
  Lines         139      139           
  Branches       20       20           
=======================================
  Hits          127      127           
  Misses         12       12

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 977c461...66b19c5. Read the comment docs.

greenkeeper bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 24, 2019
@greenkeeper
Copy link
Contributor Author

greenkeeper bot commented Sep 24, 2019

Update to this version instead 🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants